🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold policy to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is creating waves worldwide. Politicians, child protection groups, and parents are observing closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

The European Trend

Across Europe, a growing number of nations are exploring parallel bans.

• Denmark has stated a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that smartphones and apps are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". Legislation is expected to be enacted next year.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is developing a digital ID system to verify the age and identity of social media users. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the options under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 unless guardian approval is provided. Although it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age limit is a good first step," commented one parliamentarian supporting the measure.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any policy must be "grounded in strong data".

Earlier, interest built behind a proposal to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Charities have raised warnings. An organization founded by the relatives of a girl who died after encountering harmful social media material argues that a blanket age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to create platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for children," stated a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is mostly unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts overnight use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced laws demanding parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from various politicians to follow this path, a federal ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Outlook

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, world organizations take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions have downsides and "could backfire". The agency points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to prioritize safety.

Even as this international conversation evolves, the steps of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.